Previewing Youngstown State
2010 Scouting Report / 2010 Game Plan / 2011 Scouting Report / 2011 Game Plan
2011 Stats
2011 Roster
2011 Schedule
| Four Factors | Percent | Nat'l Rank |
| eFG% | 46.2 | 277 |
| Turnover Rate | 20.1 | 156 |
| Off Reb Rate | 31.1 | 224 |
| FTA/FGA | 40.7 | 95 |
| Four Factors | Percent | Nat'l Rank |
| eFG% | 47.6 | 208 |
| Turnover Rate | 19.0 | 83 |
| Off Reb Rate | 30.8 | 230 |
| FTA/FGA | 36.8 | 198 |
Only in the depths of division I college basketball purgatory do you find statements like these:
"Our three returners have all had great off seasons," Head Coach Jerry Slocum said.
With six freshmen, four juco transfers, and a division-one transfer, Youngstown's roster is almost entirely new but almost entirely the same in that they are terrible, a thousand ways terrible. The Penguins won two games in Horizon League play last year and this season figures to offer more of the same. If they have one thing going for them, it's that they've managed to avoid scheduling a bunch of power conference schools. NC State is the only one they'll play all year.
Offensively, their profile hasn't changed much despite the roster turnover. The only real difference is a stylistic one--like USC Upstate, they've upped their three-point attempts significantly. Also like Upstate, it's doing absolutely nothing for them.
Starters
Kendrick Perry (6-0, 160) -- It's tough out there for true freshman point guards, and Perry is likely to run into trouble against what is easily the best team Youngstown has played all season. But he's been a bright spot for the Penguins this season, an effective shooter with a limited workload. The assist rate is solid, and he won't be shy about shooting from outside.
Devonte Maymon (6-2, 185) -- The nice thing about the new faces on this team is that it cuts my prep time substantially. The bad part about it is these guys have no track record and it's awfully tough to judge a guy's true talents based on eight or nine games. Maymon has been a good outside shooter and is the team's second-leading scorer in the early going. He's prone to turnovers and hasn't been able to hit a two to save his life, so this is a guy that should be funneled inside.
Ashen Ward (6-3, 214) -- Does stuff.
Vytas Sulskis (6-7, 215) --Sulskis (I'm going with "soul-SKIs," also the title of a soon-to-be-released Tyler Perry film) is one of the three returnees and the team's most efficient player by far, which is impressive given that he probably hasn't learned half the names of the guys feeding him. The strange thing is that his shot percentage is lower than it has ever been. Tell employee number four to cut the shit and give him the ball already. Actually, it looks like his extremely impressive free throw rate--he's averaging a free throw attempt for every field goal attempt, which is one of the best ratios in the nation--is suppressing his shot percentage to a large extent. He's drawing over eight fouls per 40 minutes, so the ball is in his hands plenty, and with good reason: he's a good passer and scores effectively inside and out. It's still not enough. He needs to get crazy with the assertiveness.
Damian Eargle (6-7, 215) -- We've actually seen this guy before. Eargle transferred from UNC-Greensboro after the 2009 season; that year he scored 10 points against the Pack on 5-7 shooting. Why he left, I don't know. He got lots of playing time and was the one of the focal points of the offense. Likely he sensed that Greensboro's program was going down in flames. Why he thought it would be any different at Youngstown, I have no idea.
He is the team's best rebounder at both ends of the floor and an excellent shot blocker, though his workload is nothing like what it was at Greensboro. But he's hit 51% of his twos, which makes him dangerous by Penguin standards. When in doubt, hack and hack some more: he's 10-23 from the line.
Bench
DuShawn Brooks (6-6, 215), Tre Brewer (6-5, 202), Dan Boudler (6-8, 240), Blake Allen (6-1, 180). Brooks takes a third of the team's shots when he is on the floor, which is absurd considering he's shooting sub-30% inside and out. Dan Boudler plays like Boudler, runs like Boulder.
| Four Factors | Percent | Nat'l Rank |
| eFG% | 52.7 | 319 |
| Turnover Rate | 21.3 | 109 |
| Off Reb Rate | 31.7 | 125 |
| FTA/FGA | 49.6 | 332 |
| Four Factors | Percent | Nat'l Rank |
| eFG% | 51.6 | 253 |
| Turnover Rate | 20.8 | 181 |
| Off Reb Rate | 34.1 | 214 |
| FTA/FGA | 42.6 | 239 |
If the Macrowave is able, this is an ideal situation for a 15-20 minute warm-up heading into the Arizona game. Youngstown is a small team with a group of forwards that couldn't possibly hope to match up. Opponents have made 51.5% of their twos this year, and those opponents are a bunch of nobodys. If the Penguins insist on man-to-man, Tracy or no Tracy, NC State should have little trouble scoring inside and drawing fouls along the way.
The Pomeroy Predictor likes NC State by 21.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Eargle ...
… left UNCG because of some off the court issues. Apparently, he had some family issues and needed to move closer to them. He’s from the Youngstown area.
No problem
The guy is a lefty and has one of the oddest (I won’t quite call it ugly) looking shots. Unless he’s bulked up since his time at G, anyone State puits on him will shove him all over the place.
It sounds like
YSU will have a stellar RPI at the end of the year . . .
why does State keep playing so many of these teams.
within my post after the UpState game i described my issue with Will Call. the asst director of ticket operations has refunded the ten dollars i paid for the ticket via the internet. while i still lost 8 dollars for handling, i would like to thank Pat Liebert for his decision to refund the ticket price.
I agree sbas
we seem to have too many of these games against teams that we know are going to be just terrible. This year is not as bad as past seasons, and we at least are balancing out these awful teams with perennially strong OOC opponents.
by PACKHOOLIGAN on Dec 15, 2010 3:36 PM EST up reply actions
I'm okay with it
I was looking at schedules earlier today, and as it stands now, we’re playing five OOC teams in the Pomeroy top 50 (George Mason is the fifth). Among ACC schools, only Duke is playing that many top 50 teams. These cupcake games are boring, but we’ve earned a few.
Now, if you want to complain about playing bottom-50 teams when we could be scheduling schools in the mid-range that are still easy Ws, that’s different. Also easier said than scheduled, I’m guessing.
I should have clarified
My problem is playing these bottom of the barrel teams. We need cupcake games, I just hate playing these teams that we know are most likely ending up with RPI’s of 250+. It is possible (probable even) that we don’t have to pay teams like USC-Upstate as much as a Hofstra which is a team we should still beat with a more respectable RPI (most likely). You are correct that we really shouldn’t even be complaining about the OOC schedule this season, as it is stellar compared to past seasons. Kudos to you for being the voice of reason!
by PACKHOOLIGAN on Dec 16, 2010 9:05 AM EST up reply actions
i plan to watch this game via all access-gopack.
also will watch the women play at 4. the women have been a little dissapointing. while they have played 6 on the road and 4 at home (using my memory here-so if its wrong don’t be surprised). the home loss to USC Trojans hurt more than the road loss to the USC Gamecocks. i read where starter Kody Burke was out for the South Carolina game along with top sub Daniels who has been hurt since the Illinois game. Kastaneck, after starting well, as of late, has been off on her shooting. would like to see better from the team, and Kastanek has to produce for that to happen.
in view of my comment about Kastanek above, i thought
i would take a look at her stats. in the first four games which included games at Alabama and Richmond, she shot 57% and averaged 19.5 points per game. since she has shot about 36% and averaged a little over 9 points per game. i don’t see the competition level for the first four games being that much different than that of the latter six, so i would not think that would be the reason. i also would not expect Kastanek to shoot 57% for the year, but i do expect her to average more than 9 points per game and shoot better than 36%.
i noticed i misspelled her name in my preceding entry, and for that, i apologize.
with regard to the women getting into the ncaa's,
i am losing confidence in that. but conference play hasn’t started yet. wins over unc, duke (not likely), fsu or maryland will help.

by 









