Previewing Arizona
2010 Scouting Report / 2010 Game Plan / 2011 Scouting Report / 2011 Game Plan
2011 Stats (pdf)
2011 Roster
2011 Schedule
| Four Factors | Percent | Nat'l Rank |
| eFG% | 50.1 | 112 |
| Turnover Rate | 20.2 | 157 |
| Off Reb Rate | 29.3 | 284 |
| FTA/FGA | 44.3 | 44 |
| Four Factors | Percent | Nat'l Rank |
| eFG% | 56.7 | 11 |
| Turnover Rate | 20.3 | 123 |
| Off Reb Rate | 39.9 | 16 |
| FTA/FGA | 42.7 | 96 |
I hope Tim Floyd is on Sean Miller's Christmas card list this holiday season, because without Floyd, the Wildcats probably wouldn't be where they are now. Floyd resigned from Southern Cal in 2009 amidst allegations that he had provided improper benefits to one of O.J. Mayo's handlers; as a result, the recruiting class he had assembled fell apart. Three members of that class--Derrick Williams, MoMo Jones, and Solomon Hill--decided to enroll at Arizona. All three factored heavily into Arizona's thin rotation last season, much moreso than the other freshmen Miller brought in. Williams established himself as an efficient go-to scorer right from the start, and Arizona finished the year with a winning record in Pac-10 play.
What could have been a difficult multi-year rebuilding project for Miller appears now to be a program ahead of schedule. Some guys have all the luck. Jones and Hill remain solid contributors, while Williams, who was the Pac-10 Freshman of the Year in 2010, has only gotten better. Those three have started every game this season.
For the third game in a row, we've run into a team that has increased its three-point attempts significantly over the previous year. Just about everyone in Arizona's rotation has displayed some willingness to shoot the three; six guys have attempted 20 or more, four guys have attempted 30 or more. As a team, Arizona is shooting 39% from outside, which ranks in the top 40. They've been even better inside the arc and at the line. That production has come against a weak slate of defenses, so they aren't quite as scary as they look. But they're certainly better at scoring the ball than they were a year ago.
Starters
Kyle Fogg (6-3, 180) -- Fogg is an excellent outside shooter off to a slow start: 38% in '09, 42% last year, 30% this season. His workload has increased each season, to the point where his proportion of the team's shots is second only to Williams. That may have something to do with the slide, but it's a good bet his three-point shooting will come around.
MoMo Jones (6-0, 196) --Jones is also struggling with his outside shot, and unlike Fogg he doesn't have a history of good shooting out there. But he's made 50% of his twos, and that's where most of his attempts come from, anyway. Turnovers have been an issue for him this year.
Solomon Hill (6-6, 226) --Playing really well as a role player. He's a good offensive rebounder, gets to the line often where he shoots a good percentage, and he's hit almost 57% of his twos. He takes just enough threes to force the defense to respect his range.
Jamelle Horne (6-7, 224) -- A deadly three-point shooter who will spend most of his time lingering around the arc, though he's not bad inside either. Decent defensive rebounder and shot blocker.
Derrick Williams (6-8, 241) -- Averaging 19 and 7 this season, and doing so in really impressive fashion. He's shooting 61% inside, 75% (!) outside, and 80% at the line. He's feasting on offensive boards and partially as a result of that gets to the line often. He proved last season that he could take on a lot of work and still be an efficient player, but this is something else entirely. Despite using nearly 29% of the possessions, his offensive rating is over 130. That's big time. If there is a concern, it's his tendency to commit a lot of fouls--4.4 per 40 minutes. Foul trouble is about the only thing that could limit his impact on Sunday.
Bench
Kevin Parrom (6-6, 205), Jordin Mayes (6-2, 185), Jesse Perry (6-7, 210), Brendon Lavender (6-5, 215), Kyryl Natyazhko (6-11, 264). Parrom has been outstanding in a secondary role off the bench. He's shooting well, rebounding well at both ends, and his assist rate is very good. Perry is a brilliant offensive rebounder but hasn't been much of a scorer to this point. Mayes and Lavender are frequent and effective three-point shooters.
| Four Factors | Percent | Nat'l Rank |
| eFG% | 48.7 | 156 |
| Turnover Rate | 18.3 | 282 |
| Off Reb Rate | 31.2 | 102 |
| FTA/FGA | 38.3 | 192 |
| Four Factors | Percent | Nat'l Rank |
| eFG% | 47.5 | 135 |
| Turnover Rate | 22.2 | 112 |
| Off Reb Rate | 28.3 | 48 |
| FTA/FGA | 38.2 | 176 |
Miller's biggest success last season may have come at this end of the floor, where he transformed an indifferent Arizona D into one that could actually get some stops here and there. The keys to that improvement were perimeter defense and defensive rebounding. On that count, so far so good this season. Interior defense looks like a question mark again, so it could be those other factors that carry them, for better or for worse.
The Pomeroy Predictor likes Arizona by 4.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
By the way...
… I have a holiday party in my “new” neighborhood from 3-5 today, so any liveblogging will be woth-free (at least for a while)… which means we’ll play well & look like we’re going to win (at least for a while)…
for sure, a must win, for the Pack.
just wondering: if Rick Barnes (not Roy Barnes like the announcer (Lundquist?) stated at one point during the Texas-UNC telecast) was at State would he have Roy’s number like he does at Texas? maybe.
just wondering: if the announcer can come up with “nuggets” about Harrison Barnes, wouldn’t one think that he could get Rick Barnes first name right? Nah.
as i wrote, i watched both the men and women play Thursday via All Access/GoPack which has greatly improved since its inception.
the women crushed the Blue Hose (will resist fli-flopping the e and s in Hose) going up by 50 early in the second half. yes, the Blue Hose stink, but their biggest loss this year was by 10 and they have played Va Tech and Clemson.
still unsure if the women are an NCAA team, but i am sure that they have a leader in Kastenek who constantly encourages and talks to her teammates. wish the men had a real leader. might be Harrow.
with regard to the men, i felt like everyone else. why does Lowe’s teams always play this way against teams like Youngstown? why can not the team play hard from the get go?
Because, in the end...
… we’re neither a good nor well-coached team. That’s why we have baffling stretches of poor offensive execution… why we appear incapable of boxing out on the defensive end… why we come out flat against poor teams… why we don’t just methodically run an offense… we’re a mediocre team fundamentally, and that puts a cap on our consistency and our success.
by wolfonthehill on Dec 19, 2010 11:58 AM EST up reply actions
here is what gives me pause.
after Lowe’s first year and with Atsur playing, many, including me, thought he could coach. i think its reasonable to say that absent the injury to Atsur, State would have made the NCAA’s that year. during State’s run to the ACC championship game that year, and in either the Virginia or VaTech game (or both), Lowe, according to the media, called every play in the second half and State scored on most every play. further, with Atsur controlling tempo, State upset UNC in Raleigh. during that year, Big Ben stated the importance of Lowe’s coaching. of course, Big Ben did not in this last two years.
so, what changed? Lowe was lucky his first year, he hasn’t had a point guard in the caliber of Atsur, or does he sub too much? maybe in Lowe’s first year, the players played with the discipline instilled by Sendek (egaads!). Naah!
there were games in Lowe’s first year where State didn’t play with intensity, but i thought it was due to the bench of one.
everyone who reads my post here know that i am no big fan of Lowe’s coaching-especially last year; however, i do want him to succeed.

by 










