NC State 72, Delaware State 70 -- Season-Killer Averted
| Four Factors | NC State | Delaware St |
| eFG% | 50.0 | 50.9 |
| Turnover Rate | 20.2 | 17.1 |
| Off Reb Rate | 35.5 | 31.4 |
| FT Rate | 52.9 | 35.2 |
| Pts | Poss | OFF_EFF | DEF_EFF | |
| DSU | 70 | 64.4 | 108.7 | 111.8 |
| NCSU | 72 | 64.4 | 111.8 | 108.7 |
I don't know that there's anything new to mention here. Delaware State scored almost 1.3 points per possession in the second half while beating the Pack in all four factors. They shot 54%, grabbed 41% of their misses, and went to the line 19 times. You play with fire long enough and this shit is going to happen. The Hornets have a pair of legitimately good outside shooters; naturally, we lost track of both from time to time and paid for it. Those two happen to be DSU's only two outside threats, so you wouldn't think it that difficult to account for them.
Ultimately, because we couldn't focus long enough to get rid of them, it became a four minute game. Anything can happen in four minutes. A career 25% three-point shooter can hit a three to tie the game at 68, for instance.
We caught the last second break this time. Sid's final play didn't quite go the way he drew it up and Ryan Harrow fired another blank from beyond the arc, but Scott Wood was in the right place at the right time to grab the miss and score his only bucket.
Lord knows what Sid's thinking as he glances at that scoreboard. Aside from I can breathe again, that is.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
There are specifics worth talking about...
Just don’t have the energy. Howell got playing time at the five. V-berg logged just one minute.
Welcome to life under Sid, without Tracy Smith
Better get used to it. Seems a lot like Chuck without PR. That didn’t go so damn well, either.
Difference is – Chuck made bowl games with PR…
i saw this as
another nail in Lowe’s coffin-so to speak. three players were not ready to play. Wood, Gonzalez and Brown. there was a reason Wood shot so poorly. his mind wasn’t really on the game.
i really felt sorry for Lowe. has the team tuned him out? we know from last year that recruits and players read the blogs-remember Harrow’s open letter to Wolfpack fans? with many wanting Lowe to be fired, just like last year, the players have to know it. when Tom Reed was the football coach one player stated that the team was torn between trying to win and just losing so that Reed would be replaced. true here?
something i have been thinking about lately is how much is the team hurt by the transfer of Josh Davis, Johnny Thomas and (egads!) Julius Mays. Certainly Josh Davis played really hard all of the time, and Johnny Thomas at the end of last year was playing well and making strides to overcome the problems with his knee. both of these players could push Wood and replace him when he dosen’t show up mentally.
Agree that Josh would help this team a LOT
He brought energy, which we’re sorely lacking.
by wolfonthehill on Dec 23, 2010 6:35 AM EST up reply actions
Just from the box score, my thoughts are....
1 – Harrow can’t play 16 minutes without an assist. Regardless of our shitty offensive game plan (or lack thereof), it’s his job to penetrate, create, and dish.
2 – We made our free throws – so yay.
3 – Leslie is really good against high school competition like he faced last night. His problem is when he suits up against college players and still THINKS he’s both taller and quicker than everyone on the floor.
4 – Brown’s our best player… and he scored 5. That can’t happen.
5 – Wood 0-for-5 from three? That can’t happen, either.
6 – Thank God we grabbed our misses, or we lose this one.
Since I didn't see the game
All I can say is that none of this surprises me. As soon as I read in Steven’s preview that they were a slow paced team, I knew we were in for a close game. This team just does not have the forcus on defense or offense to execute anything for more than about 10 seconds.

by 









