UAB 72, NC State 52
by Akula Wolf on Mar 21, 2010 3:56 PM EDT
Email
Print| Four Factors | NC State | UAB |
| eFG% | 38.7 | 52.9 |
| Turnover Rate | 19.6 | 16.6 |
| Off Reb Rate | 25.0 | 25.8 |
| FT Rate | 37.7 | 52.9 |
| Pts | Poss | OFF_EFF | DEF_EFF | |
| UAB | 72 | 66.2 | 108.8 | 78.6 |
| NCSU | 52 | 66.2 | 78.6 | 108.8 |
There's not much to say about this one. State's offense was as putrid as usual in the first half, and this time the defense wasn't there to keep them in the game.
1 comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
at first i was upset with the way the team was playing, but after thinking about
it, i realized that for teams seeded 5-8 in the NIT it is very challenging. teams seeded 5-8 in the NIT face playing three games on the road to get to the Garden absent some higher seeded team getting upset. Motivation for UAB was another game at home and against UNC. for State, with a win, it was another game on the road at Chapel Hill. clearly State didn’t play with any intensity, and there could be reasons other than the one i referenced.
after the game, Lowe stated that his team tried to play to fast. Lowe has made similar comments at the end of the season stating that his team should be more patient. i dearly hope he is talking about this years team and not future teams. everyone knows how the fans felt about Sendek’s boring offense. if Lowe’s offense is likewise boring, Lowe’s teams better make elite 8’s and final 4’s.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on Backing The Pack
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recent FanPosts
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
