Andy Schmedsall Nixes UConn-To-ACC Proposal
Among the ACC's power moves...
"We always keep our television partners close to us,’’ [Boston College Athletic Director Gene DeFilippo] said. "You don’t get extra money for basketball. It’s 85 percent football money. TV - ESPN - is the one who told us what to do. This was football; it had nothing to do with basketball.’’
[snip]
DeFilippo does not deny that BC opposed the inclusion of UConn.
"We didn’t want them in,’’ he said. "It was a matter of turf. We wanted to be the New England team.’’
Is that true, Gene? Or did it take a phone call from one "Andy Schmedsall," a self-proclaimed representative of ESPN The Television Contracts, to persuade you to oppose the addition of Connecticut? It's the year of sabotage in the ACC, after all, and as soon as the league office can find a country music song to that effect, every fall Saturday is going to feel a bit backstabby.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i understand BC's position, but its too bad
BC is blocking UConn from getting into the ACC. with the men’s and women’s basketball teams of UConn, the ACC would be the top conference in both men’s and women’s basketball.
on a similar note, i know some VaTech fans who hold a grudge against both UNC and Duke for trying to block their entry into the ACC.
Why do we care what BC wants?
When do the fortunes of 1 school outweight the fortunes of the other 11?
I really don't know
I don’t even know what to believe at this point.
I love the Steelers.
by tannofsteel84 on Oct 10, 2011 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Really doubt...
BC has enough pull in conference to block this move alone. Think you need at least 5 to block a move, but I’m not sure. However, I agree, what BC wants should be back-listed compared to conference needs. And that should go for any team.
Even if BC couldn't block Connecticut...
…if you were selecting two members from the Big East football conference that meet ACC academic criteria, Pittsburgh and Syracuse would be your two top choices (tradition, resources, etc.).

by 











