Previewing Vanderbilt
(Pomeroy moved his stats behind a paywall, so there will be no more links to the scouting reports and such. Sorry about that. Statsheet has all the same data, it just isn't as well organized.)
2011 Stats (pdf)
2012 Roster
2012 Schedule
| Four Factors | Percent | Nat'l Rank |
| eFG% | 52.6 | 40 |
| Turnover Rate | 19.2 | 106 |
| Off Reb Rate | 32.2 | 195 |
| FTA/FGA | 48.3 | 11 |
| Four Factors | Percent | Nat'l Rank |
| eFG% | 52.9 | 30 |
| Turnover Rate | 19.0 | 105 |
| Off Reb Rate | 33.1 | 144 |
| FTA/FGA | 45.2 | 27 |
Maybe it was fortuitous that we played Princeton when we did, because while the Commodores are by no means a carbon copy in a stylistic sense, they are like a cousin with whom Princeton enjoys shooting the shit on occasion.
Vanderbilt is on a completely different level, of course. They returned everybody from a team that won 23 games overall and nine in conference play last season. And coach Kevin Stallings seems to have hit that sweet spot where you can pretty much assume his teams are going to be solid. That's always a nice place to be, especially in SEC basketball, where most people are only half-watching as they count down the minutes between their school's bowl game and signing day. Stallings essentially is Herb Sendek if he'd been allowed to go on without all the mounting pressure.
Vanderbilt's offense ranked in the top 25 in each of the last three seasons, and if you're looking for a coach to extract the most from the talent on hand, you could do worse than Stallings, who has had a top 50 offense in seven of the last eight years. While they do rely heavily on the three-point shot (every bit as much as we did under Sendek), they play at a faster tempo than you might think. Otherwise it's about what you'd expect from a well-executed perimeter-oriented style. They shoot the ball well everywhere on the floor, they don't turn the ball over a lot, and they don't really care to grab a bunch of offensive boards. When you do those first two things well, offensive boards are just gravy anyway.
Starters:
Brad Tinsley (6-3, 210) -- Tinsley was more facilitator than scorer as the point guard last season, but you forget about him at your peril. He was an efficient if opportunistic shooter, especially from beyond the arc. He's also never shot below 82.4% from the free throw line in a season. He is a little banged up, so we'll have to see how that affects his play.
John Jenkins (6-4, 220) -- Jenkins hit 172 of 394 (43.7%) three-point attempts in his first two seasons at Vandy. Last year he also made 54% of his twos and 89% of his free throws. He led the SEC in scoring and was a first-team all-conference selection. Pretty scary. But he rolled an ankle in the team's loss to Cleveland State and was held out of their win over Bucknell on Tuesday. It sounds like he'll play on Saturday, but will he be 100%?
Jeffery Taylor (6-7, 225) --Taylor was second to Jenkins in scoring last season with a similar workload, and if Jenkins is limited, Taylor most likely will be the one to carry the load. He's done most of his damage inside the arc, though he went from 11 three-point attempts in 2010 to 113 last year, with acceptable results. (He shot 34.5%.) Certainly if he continues to improve his range that'll be a huge bonus for Vanderbilt. But he's also made quite a living at the free throw line, which puts the defense in a tough spot. Hedge against the drive and make him prove he can be a consistent jump shooter and risk some costly threes, or play tight and expose yourself to fouls?
Lance Goulbourne (6-8, 230) -- For a team that lacked good defensive rebounding last year, Goulbourne was a critical component. He was good at both ends but especially so at the defensive end, where he grabbed 23% of opponents' missed shots while he was on the floor. Offensively, he was more of an occasional contributor, though he could be counted on two make half his twos and he was more than willing to shoot from outside.
Steve Tchiengang (6-9, 245) -- I keep calling him Steve Chaingang in my head, but I'm guessing that is not the correct pronunciation. Tchiengang was a reserve last year and is filling in for the injured Festus "For The Rest Of Us" Ezeli (6-11, 255), who sprained a couple of knee ligaments in late October and will miss at least a month and a half. Ezeli was a free-throw generating machine and made almost 59% of his twos in '11. This is a team that could get better in a hurry once it gets healthy after the new year. As for Tchiengang, he probably won't do a lot of shooting, but like Goulbourne, State's defense can't sleep on him. He isn't afraid to shoot the three.
On a more important note, an anagram for Steve Tchiengang is Vengeance Tights.
Bench:
Kedren Johnson (6-4, 215), Rod Odom (6-9, 215), Dai-Jon Parker (6-3, 190), Josh Henderson (6-11, 230), Kyle Fuller (6-1, 200). Fuller played sparingly last year and was not good at the basketballing. The other three guys are freshmen.
| Four Factors | Percent | Nat'l Rank |
| eFG% | 47.0 | 86 |
| Turnover Rate | 19.3 | 240 |
| Off Reb Rate | 34.5 | 249 |
| FTA/FGA | 34.5 | 109 |
| Four Factors | Percent | Nat'l Rank |
| eFG% | 46.0 | 39 |
| Turnover Rate | 17.5 | 308 |
| Off Reb Rate | 32.1 | 168 |
| FTA/FGA | 28.0 | 20 |
Some familiar problems here, and this is the area that's limited their ceiling in recent years. The defensive rebounding should be better considering the size of this team, and that along with the lack of turnovers is really squandering some good FG% defense.
I wonder sometimes about the defensive limitations imposed on a team that recruits for this sort of perimeter-oriented style. Mainly I wonder it after watching all those Sendek teams play middling-to-bad defense with the non-traditional (smaller) forwards needed to run the offense. I mean, if you have Roy Hibbert then you can have a good defense without the turnovers or the rebounds, but how often is that gonna happen? If I were coaching this sort of style, I'd give Oliver Purnell however much money he wanted to be my Head Defensive Turnover Guru.
Pomeroy Predictor likes Vandy by five. (O RLY)
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I am excited about this game
Lord knows I should know better by now, but caution be damned!
We didn’t defend the three well against Princeton though. Probably because some blogger was running around telling everyone Princeton can’t shoot 3’s for crap. I guess now Vandy will have a 100% offensive rebound rate.
I am not too optimistic
for this one. But speaking of vengeance tights, I will have mine on because I demand vengeance for the 2004 NCAA tournament fiasco.
Wolfpack Returns To Glory (WRG)
This is the first step in the Wolfpack Return to Glory. (WRG – pronounced ‘werg’ and accompanied by a trumpet fanfare btw)
“Performing well in tough road games is the hallmark of a good coach.” (Reference: Tom O’Brien – NOT)
A good coach is going to scare the pantaloons off these Commodores, and they’re going to feel lucky to escape with a win – if escape they do. A great coach is going to win this game because with Calvin playing, our bigs should be able to score on anybody, we just need to slow down their outside shooting.
Defense worries me. I think we’ll have to put CJ on Jenkins primarily so we don’t exhaust Zo and he’ll do fine, but who’s going to take Taylor? Scott’s a pretty good defender, if a touch slow – but he’ll be sitting beside MEGAHORSE translating what the cheerleaders are saying. Calvin’s got the physical ability to torment anyone, but not the defensive skills. So he’s either going to pick up fouls quickly, or Taylor will burn him. Or, perhaps we “paint” Taylor and DeShawn is the hero again.
Back in the day, before most of you were extruded from that steel from whence most Wolfpack fans come, the Pack was fun and exciting to watch even when they lost. They were in every game and gave every team fits. We adjusted our game plan for every team and we were very tough to prepare for. Opposing coaches complimented our team and coaching in every pre & post game interview.
That’s my gauge of Gott this year. We probably aren’t deep or talented enough at all positions to have an exceptional year, but we can play well every night.
March 22, 2004
Vandy’s late surge a dandy:
Eclipses 10-point deficit over final 2:44 to pull upset
Vanderbilt 75, North Carolina State 73
Time for some birthday vengeance.

The Collected Wit and Wisdom of Julius Hodge
lets hope we play HONGREY!!!!
cause when we hongrey, we EAT!
by ginger avenger on Nov 18, 2011 11:35 AM EST up reply actions
i wondered if anyone was going to bring up that game.
one of the worst ever for State. one of Sendek’s better teams, a team which was hurt by Sherrill’s ankle sprain at the beginning of the second half against UNC at Raleigh. Sherrill was lost for the year.
during Vandy’s comeback, both Hodge and Melvin fouled a three point shooter-something players of their experience should have avoided. add to that Melvin’s intentional foul in which he tripped while chasing down a Vandy player on a break away. tough game. was a hard one to get over.
that was Herb's one team
that was legitimately good (rather than “just passable enough to make the tournament”), and made me think that he would finally get over that damned hump.
…until they ended the season with the epic bed-shittings against Maryland in the ACC tournament and then Vandy.
This was the infamous game...
at least I think it was this one where my Dad ended the game by going on one of the most epic rants I have ever witnessed in my lifetime. The man yelled at the TV for a solid minute or two straight. I can’t repeat most of it because it just isn’t right to type, but it was (in a word) glorious.
And that was the day I knew that Herb Sendek was never going to last at State. Sure, he hung on for a few more seasons. But typically when you lose my Dad, you have lost your average State fan and there is no going back.
hongreyness aside
I’ll be happy in the context of this game if its competitive. I’m not quite over the edge far enough to pick us to win….but I do expect that we fight hard the entire game (no repeats of last years wisky game)
by ginger avenger on Nov 18, 2011 11:38 AM EST reply actions
I just realized
that this game is only on espn3. Now I am depressed.
I can watch it on espn3
but I hate having to watch a game on the computer.
by PACKHOOLIGAN on Nov 19, 2011 5:51 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, it sucks. I usually just hook up a laptop to the TV with a regular VGA cable.
by non_sequitur on Nov 19, 2011 6:36 PM EST up reply actions

by 











