NC State Basketball At The Halfway Point Part I
We're at the midpoint of conference play, so it's a good time to take a look at what the Wolfpack has done up until now, and how that compares to what happened last year. Sure, we know it's less bad, but how much less bad? All numbers in this post include conference games only.
| Offense | Tempo (rank) | Off_Eff | eFG% | TO% | OR% | FTR | 2FG% | 3FG% |
| 2011 | 67.2 (7) | 102.8 (7) | 46.9 (10) | 16.9 (1) | 34.1 (5) | 32.1 (8) | 45.7 (10) | 34.1 (6) |
| 2012 | 67.8 (3) | 104.7 (4) | 50.0 (3) | 18.5 (7) | 32.4 (6) | 32.8 (6) | 48.8 (4) | 35.5 (3) |
There are two questions you might have after looking at those figures: 1) is the turning into the Big Ten? 2) is the ACC getting worse from an offensive perspective? Yes and yes. Why back in my day, the average offensive efficiency in league play was around 105. Excuse me, I need to... I have a thing.
Okay, no, no. I'm good. I'm good. It's fine.
The league is slowing down and it doesn't really have anything to do with State except that it sucks a lot and I hate it, but in an amusing twist, it's now the Wolfpack buoying the league's tempo with a transition-inclined offense. Normally we're the ballast. (Daytight compartments are made out of iron.)
Anyway, it's easy enough to see how much more important it is to simply shoot the basketball well vs. shoot the basketball poorly and do some other stuff pretty well. Last year's team was better at protecting the ball and generating second chance opportunities, but didn't shoot nearly as well, particularly inside the arc.
Lorenzo Brown, Calvin Leslie and C.J. Williams have improved significantly from two-point range, Richard Howell and DeShawn Painter have essentially held steady, and State dispensed with Ryan Harrow (43.8 2FG%) and Javi Gonzalez (41.6%). And then there is the matter of having some structure to the offense.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Boston College
has an offensive efficiency of 85! How is that possible?
Also in what might be
the upset of the century, FSU is leading the ACC in eFG%.
but if you take out all our runs....
by PackMentality on Feb 7, 2012 12:20 PM EST via mobile reply actions
The difference in eFG%
from last year to this year is huge. It just goes to show what things like offseason workouts, actual practices, and offensive philosophy can do for a team.
one cant help but think
How good this team can be with a true pg .. and presumably better perimeter d and less tos next year. Basketball is fun again
by ginger avenger on Feb 7, 2012 12:55 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Besides his mini-slump
Lo has been one of the best PG’s in the ACC, imo. It is hard to remember that he is only a sophomore.
no offense meant for zo there
he is a soph as you mention and before this year he’d never played a minute at the point. Against that backdrop, he definately has overachieved.
by ginger avenger on Feb 7, 2012 7:34 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Brown played point
throughout high school and also at Hargrave. It’s more his natural position IMO.
I agree
I love Brown at the point. He is more of a playmaker than a scorer, which is why I like him at the 1 more than the 2.
You and your crazy number talk, Steven
You know the NCAA selection committee picks the teams for the tourney based on color combinations. Come on, get with something that is relevant for a change.
The eFG% number is amazing. Little shocked tempo numbers aren’t larger differential.
You have to remember
That these are ACC stats only and we have played BC twice (including the last game where they deliberately took the air out of the ball) and UVA.
Since I love the Seattle Seahawks' color scheme...
… they gotta be a 1-seed…
by wolfonthehill on Feb 7, 2012 8:53 PM EST up reply actions

by 











